I wasn't quite sure about The 'orrible 'Oo playing the half time show. It wasn't the commercial "sell out" aspect - Pete's been at that longer than most. It was whether they could out-perform some of the quality performances of the past few years, especially Petty, Macca and The Boss.
I was also a bit concerned about the possibility that The Who's set may be purely geared to promote the CSI franchise, which we saw heavily featured during the commercial breaks in the first half of the game. Of course, I wouldn't really have minded too much if all we got were the three CSI title tunes - Who Are You, Baba O Riley and Wont Get Fooled Again, but I really was hoping for something more. So when the amazing lightshow began to the strum of Pinball Wizard's classic intro, I started to relax. Pinball Wizard, Baba O Riley, Who Are You, See Me Feel Me and Won't Get Fooled Again made up a very nice 12 minute slice of 'oO, See Me Feel Me being the surprise for me.
Here's one reason that I thought they handled the half time show well versus some of the past performers - the medley. To my mind, rock medleys don't often work. For a hiphop act, it's an easy concept but it isn't something that feels natural for most rock bands. If it's a covers band (like The Stoats or Patchwork Orange for instance), that's fine, but a classic band performing medleys of their own songs just doesn't feel right. Right?
But The Who are different. They have always been able to handle the medley format brilliantly. The Superbowl show reminded me of their performance of "A Quick One" on the Rolling Stones' 1968 Rock and Roll Circus - 5 or 6 short songs sandwiched together into one mini opera. That's why it worked - unlike Petty or the Boss, The Who virtually originated the rock medley concept and have recorded and played medleys many times over their careers. Even their last studio album, "Wire and Glass", contains a mini-opera concept that they pared down and played live on the 2006 tour.
So in short, I believe that The Who triumphed through their ability to manage the situation, rather than allowing the size of the event manage them (as I think happened to Aerosmith in 2001). It is a fact that Roger had a couple of less than stellar moments here and there, and Pete seemed to have a little amp trouble. But these kind of gremlins make The Who what it is, and separated the band's performance from the overly-choreographed Stones show of 2006 and the contrived 2001 Aerosmith "and friends" appearance. The Who is still a real band and they don't always hit every note or chord perfectly. And this isn't a bad thing. They are not wrapped in cotton wool by their management or by a label head or A&R guy. They are the real deal, and I hope, a huge inspiration to young bands all over the Globe. After 46 years, they still play, look and perform with an attitude, and as they proved yesterday, they are still capable of winning over the crowd, whether in a West London church hall, or at Miami's Sun Life Stadium.
And then there were those cymbals! I'm off to spray paint mine now!.....
Long Live Rock
Long Live The Who
Monday, February 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


8 comments:
Deftly articulated mate.... for me this performance was inspirational and a huge shot in the old arm that Rock isn't dead.
Ringo's boy was a precisionist maniac while I thought Rog's voice overall probably hasn't sounded better in years... and Pete was... well, Pete!
Thank you Pete, thank you Roger, thank you 'Ooo.
One more thing... I thought Prince's "purple bathed" performance a number of years back was utterly amazing and borderline spiritual.
Agree with everything you say here.
One thing - looking at the blogs, folks seem polarized in whether they thought the show was magnificent, or absolute rubbish.
I know which side my bread is buttered.
The sound, at least to the TV audience, may have been partly to blame. The vocals seemed bare and "too close", no room for error in that sound context. Also, Roger seemed to sound better as the set went on. Maybe he was getting warmed up. It didn't help to see Pete's hairy belly but that's just part of Rock-n-Roll isn't it? They should have hired a violin instead of using harmonica on Teenage Wasteland. Question; How long has Pete Townsend being playing Fender?
Rick Swanger
To the best of my knowlege Pete has been exclusive to specially customized Eric Clapton model Strats (w/Fishman acoustic transducer pickup with a 4th knob for blending installed behind the bridge/tailpiece/vibrato) and special Fender 4x12 combo amps with 4x12 extension speaker cabs (I'm guessing a little on the amplification) for the last 5 or 6 years... the Pauls became too heavy over the years (as most that play them will attest to). The Strats are lighter and easier to smash to pieces (would have been great to see at their end of the set last night)....
To hell with the people who thought the Who's set was "complete rubbish" - they just don't "get it" and probably never did IMO.
On top of all that - the bar for light shows just got kicked up a good bit higher.
Roger is at his most beautiful since the 1970s! I want that jacket!
Post a Comment