Friday, February 5, 2010

We Need a Punk-like Music Movement Now!

I'm sitting here listening to a great song I haven't heard in years, that will be very familiar to my fellow Brits, but isn't that well known in the U.S. - The Tom Robinson Band's "Sing If You're Glad To Be Gay". At the time it was associated with the punk movement, which, far from the anarchic image it has in the US, had a very significant moral and social impact through it's minstrels. This is one of those songs that was groundbreaking, and a rallying call for equality in Thatcher's fascist Britain of the the late 70's. If you don't know it, check it out. It's a perfect song - melody, killer/catchy/incisive lyrics, and a real message at it's heart, which, whether you were gay or not, made you want to line up behind Tom and drive change. In short, it was the music that led us to the message.

I was lucky enough to be 14 in 1978. It was a very tough time for Britain with mass unemployment, polarized political parties, and a very frustrated youth which, prompted by boredom and poverty, reacted through the musical revolution we called punk.
And not only punk. Too often, it's forgotten that other genres of music emerged and contributed to change by giving a voice, or an outlet, to Britain's youth.
 West London and the Midlands spawned a new variety of reggae, combining Jamaican music with anti-racist lyrics and inspiring UK-centric libertarian views. Just check out Steel Pulse's Handsworth Revolution.
And then there was the change in what we now call classic rock. The media have often portrayed rock as dying in a velociraptor-like way at the feet of punk. It's just not true. Sure the guys who were seen as overblown (like the mighty Zep) and those who were associated with over-indulgence (like the prog bands I grew up on- Yes, ELP, Crimson), faced a crisis. But (temporarily) they gave way to the new Brit heavy metal of Judas Priest and Motorhead, who ushered in a more aggressive, harder phase for the genre, which to me, was totally in line with the punk movement.

Everywhere you looked, kids used music to shake off their frustrations and in many cases, to make a needed point, whether it be about sex, race, the Government or the system in general. And it was good.

Those bands and fans didn't have the web, social media, blogs and communities. In fact they hardly had anything. No cell-phones, no SMS, no home computers. There were three weekly music papers in the UK which reported everything, one gay magazine (which was viewed as being obscene), and virtually no media channels for messages of racial equality. Plus, the mainstream media either trivialized these bands, or literally banned their output (the BBC actually banned all radio and TV plays of the Pistols' God Save The Queen, which of course  immediately sent it to number one in the charts). And further media ignorance just added fuel to the fires, which by that time were literally burning in the streets of Bristol, Birmingham and London. "London's Burning" cried the Clash, and indeed parts of it were, sparked largely by the messages contained in the music.

Check out the video below. The Anti-Nazi League was formed in 1977 and was active through the early 80's. It was a response to the growth of Nazis and white supremecy which had formed as an aggressive fascist protest against groups of immigrants coming into the UK in the 60's and 70's (mostly from British Commonwealth countries). The ANL was supported by many bands including The Clash, The Ruts, Gang Of Four, The Members, TRB and Pete Townshend.



So my point here is, that with all of the tools sitting before today's youth, like the web, divergent media, the ability to express oneself and gather support at the drop of a click, where is music's place in change? The youth movement was a huge part of Obama's election victory, and The Boss (love him, but hardly a young guy) and a few other souls gave their all. But where is it now? Where are the bands singing about the need to support change whether it be education, healthcare, the wars or the environment? Where are the kids who should be lining up to drive change, just like those who were inspired by Tom Robinson or Steel Pulse? Where is the protest and who is the voice? Where is the musical inspiration?

And how can we, who've been through it, help them to use today's music as their sword of change?

6 comments:

Unknown said...

If it weren't for followers, where would the leaders know to go?

The Stoat said...

Great quote Digidog!

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Nice post. As someone who lived his teenage years in '70's, I remember the whole punk thing as being quite profound - in London at least. I agree that it felt like a kind of 'movement' before it grew up and got more finely honed into a marketable commodity. The media frenzy that eventually greeted it was kind of predictable (and let's remember that it was only around 10 years after the shock and horror of mods and rockers and 'long haired hippies' smoking 'pot' and having sex every 5 minutes)

I reckon that the narrow 'media' options available to people at that time made things happen with more clarity and power - it sort of blasted the whole punk ethos and music out there in a very concentrated way. It was shouted out not whispered across zillions of communication channels like things are now. You had to sit up and take notice because you didn't have many other options.

It was also a physical movement with people performing and or displaying their 'punkness' in real life on the streets, on stage, fanning the flames. Who can forget Sham 69 on the roof of The Virgin Megastore? (Well, I can!) No myspace or youtube then as you say.

Punk was great in highlighting some serious social issues and helped to amplify 'the voice of youth' and making it political into the bargain. It helped create our right to have a view for sure and it gave us permission to have multiple music tastes. There were quite a few bad things too (imo)...

Most of the music was unbelievably crap (but I accept that I was coming from a Zep/Who/Free/Genesis place so a tad biased!) it spawned loads of cringe making TV shows aimed at a more empowered young audience featuring young TV presenters hanging off studio scaffolding. Strangely, punk itself was kind of rebelled against as we all confidently rocketed into the 80's and 90's in search of cash, power, noise and celebrity...

Overall, I think punk acted as a bit of a cold shower musically (and maybe politically too) but rather than actually changing anything forever, it left its mark, its style, its layer, to be used and mixed into the musical melting pot for all music thereafter.


My favourite cynical post punk musical testament is Todd Snider's 'My Generation (part 2)' Worth a listen when you have a mo'

Rick said...

I'm ashamed to admit this; but I was a bit tired of all the Rock music and was full on into more soulful dancing tunes that were more suitable for lit up dance floors. Earth, Wind and Fire, Grand Central Station, The Isley Brothers, Stevie Wonder; of course along with these came K.C. and the Sunshine Band, Donna Summer, The BeeGees etc. While still spending time in clubs that played pre-recorded soul (disco) I eventually started listening more to Van Halen, The Police (big time) and ZZ Top made their second career with Deguello, George Thoregood with "Bad to the Bone", The Stones came out with Miss You and Tatto You. There is lots more,,,unfotunately, I hated Punk and wanted nothing to do with it (what a bunch of losers!)
One of the reason we have so much fun at Open Mics is because some of us combine these genres into a Rock & Soul effort. It totally works!

The Stoat said...

Interesting views chaps. It's great to understand how other people viewed something like this.
Rick- I have worn KC (sunshine band)'s stage suit. I'll post a photo!
Mark- I didnt know about Sham 69 playing on the roof.....more details please...."If the kids, are united...etc....etc"

Post a Comment

Lennon Video Wall